Close Menu
GunTacGear
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns and Gear
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Tactical
  • Videos
Trending

Chiefs’ new stud Kenneth Walker runs wild, Bo Nix melts down as Kansas City obliterates Broncos in MNF blowout

September 15, 2026

Georgia mayor, 23, ousted 10 months after making history as state’s youngest mayor

September 15, 2026

Dozens missing after passenger ferry sinks as rescuers scour South Pacific coastline

September 15, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
GunTacGear
Subscribe
X (Twitter)
Login
GTG Trusted Journalism in Firearms News
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns and Gear
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Tactical
  • Videos
GunTacGear
  • Guns and Gear
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Tactical
  • Videos
Home»Tactical
Tactical

Pentagon to explore cheaper replacements for the MQ-9 Reaper

By July 8, 20263 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Pentagon to explore cheaper replacements for the MQ-9 Reaper
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The Pentagon is exploring cheap, long-range drone options that may eventually replace the MQ-9 Reaper.

The search comes after dozens of MQ-9s were swatted out of the sky during the Iran war, according to a May 13 Congressional Research Service report.

With the Air Force currently possessing about 135 Reapers — which cost approximately $30 million apiece — such a loss rate is not sustainable, especially against a force like Iran, whose air defenses are less sophisticated than those of China or Russia.

“The Joint Force’s reliance on low-density, high-value ‘exquisite’ (>$30 million) manned and unmanned aircraft is unsustainable against adversaries utilizing layered defenses enabled by increasingly low-cost antiaircraft capabilities,” warned the Defense Innovation Unit solicitation for a new drone, which the Pentagon wants to “execute missions that the MQ-9A performs today.”

Rather than build a better Reaper, DIU is opting for an expendable replacement. The Massed Modular Aircraft, or MMA, project aims to develop a UAV designed to operate in such large numbers that it can absorb heavy losses and still overwhelm enemy defenses.

Particularly of interest is the size of the MMA. Drone swarms may be the next big thing in unmanned warfare, but generally those hordes are made up of small, inexpensive UAVs with limited range and payload.

But the DIU solicitation envisions a drone that has long range and a heavy payload — and is still inexpensive enough for mass production. The solicitation calls for a payload of at least 2,800 pounds, a bit less than the MQ-9’s 3,800-pound capacity.

The MMA should also have an unrefueled combat range of at least 2,300 nautical miles, according to the solicitation, and a one-way transfer range of at least 8,000 nautical miles. Additionally, the drone should reach speeds of at least 200 miles per hour and have the ability to operate from a 6,000-foot runway or improvised airstrips.

The DIU solicitation states that the drone should have “sufficient available size, weight, power (25kW), and cooling (5kW) to host a variety of internal and/or external payloads,” with a level of autonomous operations that would allow one operator to control several drones.

The solicitation does not specify the MMA’s dimensions, though the specifications suggest a drone comparable in size to the MQ-9. It also did not list a desired price point, though presumably it would be less than the $30 million price tag of an MQ-9.

The timeline for the MMA project, meanwhile, is ambitious. DIU is calling for “full-scale prototype flight testing within 21 months of award, with a targeted Initial Operating Capability (IOC) in FY2031. IOC for MMA is envisioned as 20 mission-ready aircraft delivered to an operational unit, able to be deployed.”

Pentagon solicitations continue to reflect a mindfulness of lessons from the Ukraine War, as well as the experiences during the Iran War. In both conflicts, the defender exhausted interceptors before the attacker ran out of drones.

“Keeping a constant airborne MMA presence to launch weapons, gather intelligence, perform electronic warfare missions, or relay communications will force an adversary to stay on the defensive,” DIU said. “This relentless pressure will exhaust the adversary, forcing them to burn through expensive anti-aircraft missiles and resources faster than they can be replaced.”

About Michael Peck

Michael Peck is a correspondent for Defense News and a columnist for the Center for European Policy Analysis. He holds an M.A. in political science from Rutgers University. Find him at theuncommondefense.com. His email is mikedefense1@gmail.com.

Read the full article here

Keep Reading

Navy families evacuated from Bahrain are still trying to retrieve their belongings

US Air Force secretary reveals deployment of on-orbit space control weapons

Organizers break ground on education center at Pentagon 9/11 memorial

US military must focus on ‘right mix’ of weapons amid stockpile concerns: Official

Geissele Automatics reveals ‘production-ready’ assault rifle for SOCOM

Vengeance and Fury: US Air Force names new CCAs amid ambitious production goal

Editors Picks

Georgia mayor, 23, ousted 10 months after making history as state’s youngest mayor

September 15, 2026

Dozens missing after passenger ferry sinks as rescuers scour South Pacific coastline

September 15, 2026

Oklahoma State might have known which plays Oregon Ducks were running during upset win

September 15, 2026

Navy families evacuated from Bahrain are still trying to retrieve their belongings

September 15, 2026

Top Articles

White House denies Trump influenced by ‘pardon brokers’ after ’60 Minutes’ investigation

September 14, 2026

Springfield XD Mod.4 Review: Four Benjamins

September 14, 2026

McConnell returns after months-long absence for crucial vote

September 14, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) TikTok Instagram
© 2026 GunTacGear. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?