Close Menu
GunTacGear
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns and Gear
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Tactical
  • Videos
Trending

NBA star Dejounte Murray requests trade after Pelicans clash, public frustration spills onto social media

November 14, 2026

Democrat flips Alaska governor’s mansion after Trump-backed GOP infighting

November 14, 2026

Kentucky needs buzzer-beating three to survive Northern Arizona’s upset bid at Rupp Arena

November 14, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
GunTacGear
Subscribe
X (Twitter)
Login
GTG Trusted Journalism in Firearms News
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns and Gear
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Tactical
  • Videos
GunTacGear
  • Guns and Gear
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Tactical
  • Videos
Home»Tactical
Tactical

US court blocks Pentagon from removing transgender troops, for now

By June 1, 20263 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
US court blocks Pentagon from removing transgender troops, for now
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

A U.S. appeals court on Monday said President Donald Trump’s administration could, for now, bar transgender people from enlisting in the military, but blocked the expulsion of current service members while a lawsuit plays out.

A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in a 2-1 ruling said the 2025 policy was unlawfully motivated “by the bare desire to harm a politically unpopular group.”

But the Pentagon has broad powers to set enlistment standards, the court said, and can continue to ban transgender people from newly entering the military pending the outcome of a lawsuit by transgender current and would-be service members.

“It appears to us to be a much greater hardship to end a military career than to delay the start of one,” wrote Circuit Judge Robert Wilkins, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama.

Circuit Judge Justin Walker, a Trump appointee, in a dissenting opinion said courts “have neither the expertise nor the authority to decide whether the military can exclude the plaintiffs from its ranks.”

Jennifer Levi of LGBTQ rights group GLAD Law, who represents the plaintiffs, applauded the decision.

“This decisive ruling confirms that the Trump Administration has no legitimate basis to discharge transgender service members who have met every demanding standard and proven, time and again, their fitness and dedication to serve,” Levi said in a statement.

The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The ruling partially upholds a 2025 decision by a Washington, D.C.-based federal judge who had blocked the entire policy from being implemented pending further litigation. The judge said the policy amounted to sex discrimination and likely violated the U.S. Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection under the law.

Trump in a January 2025 executive order said that adopting a transgender identity “conflicts with a soldier’s commitment to an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle.” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth implemented Trump’s order soon after, prompting legal challenges.

The ban on military service is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to eradicate the recognition and accommodation of transgender people throughout American life.

Federal agencies have dropped lawsuits filed on behalf of transgender workers, ended settlements that benefited transgender students and launched investigations into hospitals and doctors for providing gender-affirming treatment to minors.

The military has about 1.3 million active-duty personnel, according to Department of Defense data. While transgender rights advocates say there are as many as 15,000 transgender service members, officials say the number is in the low thousands.

The U.S. Supreme Court in May 2025 allowed the policy to be implemented, lifting a judge’s ruling in a separate case out of the state of Washington that had temporarily blocked the ban.

But the Supreme Court did not explain its reasoning and may have been ruling on a technicality rather than the merits of the case, Wilkins wrote for the D.C. Circuit on Monday.

Read the full article here

Keep Reading

Congress’s medical office operated without proper oversight for years, DoD watchdog says

Lawsuit says Pentagon’s future warfare panel lacks transparency and balance

Coast Guard responds to New Orleans ship collision, 140 missing 

Navy makes big changes to seabag

The Air Force maverick ‘who changed the art of war’

US Air Force adopts new Force Design focusing on sensors and autonomy

Editors Picks

Democrat flips Alaska governor’s mansion after Trump-backed GOP infighting

November 14, 2026

Kentucky needs buzzer-beating three to survive Northern Arizona’s upset bid at Rupp Arena

November 14, 2026

Mike Evans ruled out, Trent Williams questionable as NFC-leading 49ers’ injury concerns persist

November 14, 2026

Cowboys owner Jerry Jones updates timeline for NFL’s 18-game schedule, floats preseason reduction

November 14, 2026

Top Articles

ADF seeks to defend Washington girls sports measure, argues state cannot fully represent female athletes

November 14, 2026

Which current three-loss team would be the most dangerous in this year’s College Football Playoff?

November 14, 2026

Do You Always Need More Options?

November 14, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) TikTok Instagram
© 2026 GunTacGear. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?