Close Menu
GunTacGear
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns and Gear
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Tactical
  • Videos
Trending

Inside the protest playbook to vilify Israel on ‘global day of action’

October 10, 2026

Workers erupt over DC plan to bring robotaxis to city streets: ‘This is bulls—’

October 10, 2026

Liberal hot spot residents can’t agree on what socialism means as far-left movements gains steam

October 10, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
GunTacGear
Subscribe
X (Twitter)
Login
GTG Trusted Journalism in Firearms News
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns and Gear
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Tactical
  • Videos
GunTacGear
  • Guns and Gear
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Tactical
  • Videos
Home»Tactical
Tactical

The Pentagon asked industry how fast it could make more weapons. The numbers remain private.

By September 21, 20264 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
The Pentagon asked industry how fast it could make more weapons. The numbers remain private.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Twenty-six days after the Pentagon’s deadline for defense companies to propose faster weapons production, the Defense Department has not publicly disclosed how many companies responded or what production timelines they offered.

Deputy Defense Secretary Steve Feinberg gave industry leaders until Aug. 26 to submit plans for “significantly faster, more aggressive delivery schedules and/or increased production for critical capabilities,” according to his Aug. 5 memo.

Feinberg directed companies to identify ways to accelerate production and delivery, propose capital investments and facility expansions and explain how the Pentagon could enable higher production.

The memo identified 16 critical programs under consideration for accelerated production or increased procurement. The responses were intended to inform the department’s fiscal 2028 budget request.

The request came as the use of U.S. weapons during the Iran war put pressure on stocks of air-defense interceptors and other precision munitions.

U.S. inventories of Patriot interceptors had fallen from about 2,330 before the war to between 759 and 827 by the end of July, according to a Center for Strategic and International Studies analysis. THAAD stocks had fallen from 452 to between 234 and 278.

CSIS estimated production timelines of about 42 months for PAC-3 MSE interceptors and 53 months for THAAD interceptors.

The Pentagon did not respond to questions about how many companies responded to Feinberg’s request or whether the department had accepted or funded any of the proposals.

General Dynamics also declined to discuss its communications with the department.

“We are not able to comment on our communications with the Department of War,” a General Dynamics spokesman said.

Lockheed Martin, a major supplier of U.S. missile-defense systems, did not provide a specific production timeline in response to questions from Military Times.

“We continue to have dialogue with the U.S. government to deliver what the department is asking of us and our team is pushing to do even more, faster,” a Lockheed Martin spokesman said. “We’re making significant investments in our workforce, infrastructure and production capacity and working with key suppliers to accelerate delivery of the critical capabilities that strengthen America’s Arsenal of Freedom.”

U.S. forces conduct live-fire exercises involving Patriot missile launches at the Udari Range Complex, Kuwait, on Dec. 9, 2025. (U.S. Central Command)

Lockheed separately announced Thursday that it had received its first PAC-3 MSE housing components from GM Defense, 22 days after the companies signed a production contract. The company said the components, which can traditionally take months or years to produce, were manufactured using GM’s casting and machining capabilities.

Lockheed said it is investing $8 billion to $9 billion to expand munitions production, including new buildings, facility expansions and thousands of jobs at more than 20 U.S. sites. The company also said planned expansions will increase its munitions production and warehousing space by nearly 50%.

The company did not say whether those investments were submitted as part of Feinberg’s Aug. 5 request.

New agreements

The Pentagon was already using framework agreements and contracts to accelerate production before Feinberg’s deadline.

On July 27, the department announced seven-year framework agreements intended to boost production of propulsion components for PAC-3 MSE and THAAD interceptors. L3Harris said its PAC-3 agreement would nearly triple production of certain propulsion products, while its THAAD agreement was intended to quadruple production of key propulsion components.

On Aug. 3, the defense department, in cooperation with Northrop Grumman and Lockheed Martin, announced two framework agreements to expand production capacity for critical PAC-3 and THAAD interceptor components. The agreements were intended to support the department’s goals of tripling PAC-3 production capacity and quadrupling THAAD production capacity.

On Aug. 14, DoD announced two separate framework agreements with Boeing and RTX to increase production of components for SM-3 Block IB and SM-3 Block IIA interceptors.

On Aug. 17, the Pentagon announced a $22.9 billion Navy contract with RTX to accelerate production of Tomahawk missiles.

On Aug. 31, five days after the industry deadline, the Pentagon announced additional seven-year multiyear procurement agreements with Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics designed to increase production quantities and accelerate delivery schedules for critical missile subcomponents supporting PAC-3 MSE and THAAD.

The Pentagon separately identified production goals of tripling PAC-3 MSE production capacity and quadrupling THAAD production capacity, with funding subject to annual appropriations from Congress.

The public announcements did not identify those agreements as resulting from companies’ responses to Feinberg’s Aug. 5 request.

What remains unclear is whether the 21-day exercise changed what the Pentagon plans to buy, how quickly it expects industry to deliver it or what additional funding and infrastructure the department will seek in its fiscal 2028 budget request.

Natalie Oliverio is an independent journalist and Navy veteran who covers military and veterans’ issues. Drawing on her experience as a talent executive and mentor, she writes about the policies, people and programs shaping the military community.

Read the full article here

Keep Reading

Patients struggle to access MHS following changes to login process

US Army activates new multi-domain task force to ‘deny, disrupt’ enemies in Indo-Pacific

Pentagon, Raytheon sign $6.3B deal to replenish US missile interceptor supply

How the US military plan to livestream an execution compares with global practice

Soldiers intervene on roadside to save children from alleged knife attack

Air Force bases along Gulf Coast relocate aircraft ahead of Hurricane Isaias

Editors Picks

Workers erupt over DC plan to bring robotaxis to city streets: ‘This is bulls—’

October 10, 2026

Liberal hot spot residents can’t agree on what socialism means as far-left movements gains steam

October 10, 2026

Why Smart Gun Owners STILL Carry Snub-Nose Revolvers!

October 10, 2026

Super Bowl LXI gets Pat McAfee treatment as ESPN adds alternate broadcast

October 10, 2026

Top Articles

James Talarico resurfaces after extended absence as his campaign pushes back

October 10, 2026

Lions head coach pays tribute to Mike Ditka after learning of his death from a press conference question

October 10, 2026

Trump brings Mike Tyson on stage at Syracuse rally, jokes that he is Bruce Blakeman’s personal security

October 10, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) TikTok Instagram
© 2026 GunTacGear. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?